Live MySQL Slave Rebuild with Percona Toolkit

MySQL slave data out of sync

MySQL slave data out of syncRecently, we had an edge case where a MySQL slave went out-of-sync but it couldn’t be rebuilt from scratch. The slave was acting as a master server to some applications and it had data was being written to it. It was a design error, and this is not recommended, but it happened. So how do you synchronize the data in this circumstance? This blog post describes the steps taken to recover from this situation. The tools used to recover the slave were pt-slave-restartpt-table-checksum, pt-table-sync and mysqldiff.

Scenario

To illustrate this situation, it was built a master x slave configuration with sysbench running on the master server to simulate a general application workload. The environment was set with a Percona Server 5.7.24-26 and sysbench 1.0.16.

Below are the sysbench commands to prepare and simulate the workload:

# Create Data
sysbench --db-driver=mysql --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=msandbox 
  --mysql-socket=/tmp/mysql_sandbox45008.sock --mysql-db=test --range_size=100 
  --table_size=5000 --tables=100 --threads=1 --events=0 --time=60 
  --rand-type=uniform /usr/share/sysbench/oltp_read_only.lua prepare
# Simulate Workload
sysbench --db-driver=mysql --mysql-user=root --mysql-password=msandbox 
  --mysql-socket=/tmp/mysql_sandbox45008.sock --mysql-db=test --range_size=100 
  --table_size=5000 --tables=100 --threads=10 --events=0 --time=6000 
  --rand-type=uniform /usr/share/sysbench/oltp_read_write.lua --report-interval=1 run

With the environment set, the slave server was stopped, and some operations to desynchronize the slave were performed to reproduce the problem.

Fixing the issue

With the slave desynchronized, a restart on the replication was executed. Immediately, the error below appeared:

Last_IO_Errno: 1236
Last_IO_Error: Got fatal error 1236 from master when reading data from binary log: 'Could not find first log file name in binary log index file'

To recover the slave from this error, we had to point the slave to an existing binary log with a valid binary log position. To get a valid binary log position, the command shown below had to be executed on the master:

master [localhost] {msandbox} ((none)) > show master statusG
*************************** 1. row ***************************
File: mysql-bin.000007
Position: 218443612
Binlog_Do_DB:
Binlog_Ignore_DB:
Executed_Gtid_Set:
1 row in set (0.01 sec)

Then, a CHANGE MASTER command was run on the slave:

slave1 [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > change master to master_log_file='mysql-bin.000007', MASTER_LOG_POS=218443612;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)
slave1 [localhost] {msandbox} (test) > start slave;
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.00 sec)

Now the slave had a valid binary log file to read, but since it was inconsistent, it hit another error:

Last_SQL_Errno: 1032
               Last_SQL_Error: Could not execute Delete_rows event on table test.sbtest8; Can't find record in 'sbtest8', Error_code: 1032; handler error HA_ERR_KEY_NOT_FOUND; the event's master log mysql-bin.000005, end_log_pos 326822861

Working past the errors

Before fixing the inconsistencies, it was necessary to keep the replication running and to skip the errors. For this, the pt-slave-restart tool will be used. The tool needs to be run on the slave server:

pt-slave-restart --user root --socket=/tmp/mysql_sandbox45008.sock --ask-pass

The tool skips errors and starts the replication threads. Below is an example of the output of the pt-slave-restart:

$ pt-slave-restart --user root --socket=/tmp/mysql_sandbox45009.sock --ask-pass
Enter password:
2019-02-22T14:18:01 S=/tmp/mysql_sandbox45009.sock,p=...,u=root mysql-relay.000007        1996 1146
2019-02-22T14:18:02 S=/tmp/mysql_sandbox45009.sock,p=...,u=root mysql-relay.000007        8698 1146
2019-02-22T14:18:02 S=/tmp/mysql_sandbox45009.sock,p=...,u=root mysql-relay.000007       38861 1146

Finding the inconsistencies

With the tool running on one terminal, the phase to check the inconsistencies began. First things first, an object definition check was performed using mysqldiff utility. The mysqldiff tool is part of MySQL utilities. To execute the tool:

$ mysqldiff --server1=root:[email protected]:48008 --server2=root:[email protected]:48009 test:test --difftype=sql --changes-for=server2

And below are the differences found between the master and the slave:

1-) A table that doesn’t exist

# WARNING: Objects in server1.test but not in server2.test:
# TABLE: joinit

2-) A wrong table structure

# Comparing `test`.`sbtest98` to `test`.`sbtest98` [FAIL]
# Transformation for --changes-for=server2:
#
ALTER TABLE `test`.`sbtest98`
DROP INDEX k_98,
DROP COLUMN x,
ADD INDEX k_98 (k);

Performing the recommendations on the slave (creating the table and the table modification) the object’s definition was now equal. The next step was to check data consistency. For this, the pt-table-checksum was used to identify which tables are out-of-sync. This command was run on the master server.

$ pt-table-checksum -uroot -pmsandbox --socket=/tmp/mysql_sandbox48008.sock --replicate=percona.checksums --create-replicate-table --empty-replicate-table --no-check-binlog-format --recursion-method=hosts

And an output example:

01 master]$ pt-table-checksum --recursion-method dsn=D=percona,t=dsns --no-check-binlog-format --nocheck-replication-filter --host 127.0.0.1 --user root --port 48008 --password=msandbox
Checking if all tables can be checksummed ...
Starting checksum ...
  at /usr/bin/pt-table-checksum line 332.
Replica lag is 66 seconds on bm-support01.bm.int.percona.com.  Waiting.
Replica lag is 46 seconds on bm-support01.bm.int.percona.com.  Waiting.
Replica lag is 33 seconds on bm-support01.bm.int.percona.com.  Waiting.
           TS ERRORS  DIFFS     ROWS  DIFF_ROWS  CHUNKS SKIPPED    TIME TABLE
02-26T16:27:59      0      0     5000          0       1       0   0.037 test.sbtest1
02-26T16:27:59      0      0     5000          0       1       0   0.039 test.sbtest10
02-26T16:27:59      0      1     5000          0       1       0   0.033 test.sbtest100
02-26T16:27:59      0      1     5000          0       1       0   0.034 test.sbtest11
02-26T16:27:59      0      1     5000          0       1       0   0.040 test.sbtest12
02-26T16:27:59      0      1     5000          0       1       0   0.034 test.sbtest13

Fixing the data inconsistencies

Analyzing the DIFFS column it is possible to identify which tables were compromised. With this information, the pt-table-sync tool was used to fix these inconsistencies. The tool synchronizes MySQL table data efficiently, performing non-op changes on the master so they can be replicated and applied on the slave. The tools need to be run on the slave server. Below is an example of the tool running:

$ pt-table-sync --execute --sync-to-master h=localhost,u=root,p=msandbox,D=test,t=sbtest100,S=/tmp/mysql_sandbox48009.sock

It is possible to perform a dry-run of the tool before executing the changes to check what changes the tool will apply:

$ pt-table-sync --print --sync-to-master h=localhost,u=root,p=msandbox,D=test,t=sbtest100,S=/tmp/mysql_sandbox48009.sock
REPLACE INTO `test`.`sbtest100`(`id`, `k`, `c`, `pad`) VALUES ('1', '1654', '97484653464-60074971666-42998564849-40530823048-27591234964-93988623123-02188386693-94155746040-59705759910-14095637891', '15000678573-85832916990-95201670192-53956490549-57402857633') /*percona-toolkit src_db:test src_tbl:sbtest100 src_dsn:D=test,P=48008,S=/tmp/mysql_sandbox48009.sock,h=127.0.0.1,p=...,t=sbtest100,u=root dst_db:test dst_tbl:sbtest100 dst_dsn:D=test,S=/tmp/mysql_sandbox48009.sock,h=localhost,p=...,t=sbtest100,u=root lock:1 transaction:1 changing_src:1 replicate:0 bidirectional:0 pid:17806 user:vinicius.grippa host:bm-support01.bm.int.percona.com*/;
REPLACE INTO `test`.`sbtest100`(`id`, `k`, `c`, `pad`) VALUES ('2', '3007', '31679133794-00154186785-50053859647-19493043469-34585653717-64321870163-33743380797-12939513287-31354198555-82828841987', '30122503210-11153873086-87146161761-60299188705-59630949292') /*percona-toolkit src_db:test src_tbl:sbtest100 src_dsn:D=test,P=48008,S=/tmp/mysql_sandbox48009.sock,h=127.0.0.1,p=...,t=sbtest100,u=root dst_db:test dst_tbl:sbtest100 dst_dsn:D=test,S=/tmp/mysql_sandbox48009.sock,h=localhost,p=...,t=sbtest100,u=root lock:1 transaction:1 changing_src:1 replicate:0 bidirectional:0 pid:17806 user:vinicius.grippa host:bm-support01.bm.int.percona.com*/;

After executing the pt-table-sync, we recommend that you run the pt-table-checksum again and check if the DIFFS column shows the value of 0.

Conclusion

This blog post was intended to cover all possible issues that could happen on a slave when it goes out-of-sync such as DDL operations, binary log purge and DML operations. This process involves many steps and it could take a long time to finish, especially in large databases. Note that this process might take longer than the backup/restore process. However, in situations like the one mentioned above, it might be the only solution to recover a slave.


Image based on Photo by Randy Fath on Unsplash

 

Read more at: http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/

A schema change inconsistency with Galera Cluster for MySQL

I recently worked on a case where one node of a Galera cluster had its schema desynchronized with the other nodes. And that was although Total Order Isolation method was in effect to perform the schema changes. Let’s see what happened.

Background

For those of you who are not familiar with how Galera can perform schema changes, here is a short recap:

  • Two methods are available depending on the value of the wsrep_OSU_method setting. Both have benefits and drawbacks, it is not the main topic of this post.
  • With TOI (Total Order Isolation), a DDL statement is performed at the same point in the replication flow on all nodes, giving strong guarantees that the schema is always identical on all nodes.
  • With RSU (Rolling Schema Upgrade), a DDL statement is not replicated to the other nodes. Until the DDL statement has been executed on all nodes, the schema is not consistent everywhere (so you should be careful not to break replication).

You can look at the official document here.

If you read carefully the section on TOI, you will see that “[…] TOI transactions will never fail certification and are guaranteed to be executed.” But also that “The system replicates the TOI query before execution and there is no way to know whether it succeeds or fails. Thus, error checking on TOI queries is switched off.”

Confusing? Not really. It simply means that with TOI, a DDL statement will always pass certification. But if for some reason, the DDL statement fails on one of the nodes, it will not be rolled back on the other nodes. This opens the door for schema inconsistencies between nodes.

A test case

Let’s create a table on a 3-node Percona XtraDB Cluster 5.6 cluster and insert a few rows:

pxc1> create table t (id int not null auto_increment primary key, c varchar(10));
pxc1> insert into t (c) values ('aaaa'),('bbbb');

Then on node 3, let’s introduce a schema change on t that can make other schema changes fail:

pxc3> set global wsrep_OSU_method=RSU;
pxc3> alter table t add d int;
pxc3> set global wsrep_OSU_method=TOI;

As the schema change was done on node 3 with RSU, it is not replicated to the other nodes.

Now let’s try another schema change on node 1:

pxc1> alter table t add d varchar(10);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0,14 sec)
Records: 0  Duplicates: 0  Warnings: 0

Apparently everything went well and indeed on node 1 and 2, we have the correct schema:

pxc2>show create table tG
*************************** 1. row ***************************
       Table: t
Create Table: CREATE TABLE t (
  id int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  c varchar(10) DEFAULT NULL,
  d varchar(10) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (id)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=8 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1

But on node 3, the statement failed so the schema has not been changed:

pxc3> show create table tG
*************************** 1. row ***************************
       Table: t
Create Table: CREATE TABLE t (
  id int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  c varchar(10) DEFAULT NULL,
  d int(11) DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (id)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=8 DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1

The error is visible in the error log of node 3:

2014-07-18 10:37:14 9649 [ERROR] Slave SQL: Error 'Duplicate column name 'd'' on query. Default database: 'repl_test'. Query: 'alter table t add d varchar(10)', Error_code: 1060
2014-07-18 10:37:14 9649 [Warning] WSREP: RBR event 1 Query apply warning: 1, 200
2014-07-18 10:37:14 9649 [Warning] WSREP: Ignoring error for TO isolated action: source: 577ffd51-0e52-11e4-a30e-4bde3a7ad3f2 version: 3 local: 0 state: APPLYING flags: 65 conn_id: 3 trx_id: -1 seqnos (l: 17, g: 200, s: 199, d: 199, ts: 7722177758966)

But of course it is easy to miss. And then a simple INSERT can trigger a shutdown on node3:

pxc2> insert into t (c,d) values ('cccc','dddd');
Query OK, 1 row affected (0,00 sec)

will trigger this on node 3:

2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [ERROR] Slave SQL: Column 2 of table 'repl_test.t' cannot be converted from type 'varchar(10)' to type 'int(11)', Error_code: 1677
2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [Warning] WSREP: RBR event 3 Write_rows apply warning: 3, 201
2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [Warning] WSREP: Failed to apply app buffer: seqno: 201, status: 1
	 at galera/src/trx_handle.cpp:apply():340
[...]
2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [Note] WSREP: Received NON-PRIMARY.
2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [Note] WSREP: Shifting SYNCED -> OPEN (TO: 201)
2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [Note] WSREP: Received self-leave message.
2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [Note] WSREP: Flow-control interval: [0, 0]
2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [Note] WSREP: Received SELF-LEAVE. Closing connection.
2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [Note] WSREP: Shifting OPEN -> CLOSED (TO: 201)
2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [Note] WSREP: RECV thread exiting 0: Success
2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [Note] WSREP: recv_thread() joined.
2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [Note] WSREP: Closing replication queue.
2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [Note] WSREP: Closing slave action queue.
2014-07-18 10:42:27 9649 [Note] WSREP: bin/mysqld: Terminated.

Conclusion

As on regular MySQL, schema changes are challenging with Galera. Some subtleties can create a lot of troubles if you are not aware of them. So before running DDL statement, make sure you fully understand how TOI and RSU methods work.

The post A schema change inconsistency with Galera Cluster for MySQL appeared first on MySQL Performance Blog.

Read more at: http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/